The 1988 Ford Ranger equipped with the 2.3L engine and manual transmission is known for its fuel efficiency in the compact pickup truck segment. This model features a 2.3-liter 4-cylinder engine paired with a 5-speed manual transmission, offering reliable performance with optimized fuel economy. Below are key sections covering specifications, fuel efficiency data, driving tips, maintenance recommendations, and comparison data.
Key components: 2.3L 4-cylinder engine, 5-speed manual transmission, rear-wheel drive configuration.
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| Engine Type | 2.3L 4-cylinder gasoline |
| Transmission | 5-speed manual |
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive |
| Fuel System | Electronic fuel injection |
| Horsepower | 90 hp @ 4000 rpm |
| Torque | 125 lb-ft @ 2600 rpm |
| Curb Weight | Approximately 2,800 lbs |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.5 gallons |
| Axle Ratio | 3.45:1 (standard) |
| EPA Vehicle Class | Small Pickup Truck |
Official EPA estimates and real-world performance data for the 1988 Ford Ranger 2.3L manual transmission.
NOTE! Actual mileage may vary based on driving habits, maintenance, and road conditions.
Optimize your driving habits to maximize fuel efficiency.
TIP! Anticipate traffic flow to minimize braking and acceleration.
Owner-reported fuel economy data from various driving conditions.
Urban Driving: 18-20 MPG in stop-and-go traffic. Highway Cruising: 25-28 MPG at 55-65 MPH. Mixed Use: 21-24 MPG typical combined driving. Towing/Loaded: 15-18 MPG when carrying maximum payload.
Factors affecting real-world MPG: Driving style, terrain, climate conditions, vehicle condition, fuel quality.
How the 1988 Ranger 2.3L manual compares to competitors.
Note: The Ranger 2.3L manual transmission offers competitive fuel economy in its class.
Detailed technical data affecting fuel economy performance.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Displacement | 2.3L (2300 cc) |
| Bore x Stroke | 3.78" x 3.13" |
| Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Requirement | 87 Octane Regular |
| Transmission Gear Ratios | 1st: 3.72, 2nd: 2.20, 3rd: 1.50, 4th: 1.00, 5th: 0.80 |
| Final Drive Ratio | 3.45:1 |
| Drag Coefficient | 0.44 |
| Frontal Area | 24.5 sq ft |
Problems that can reduce fuel efficiency and their solutions.
| Issue | Impact on MPG | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Worn spark plugs | Reduction of 2-3 MPG | Replace with proper heat range plugs |
| Clogged air filter | Reduction of 1-2 MPG | Replace air filter element |
| Underinflated tires | Reduction of 1-3 MPG | Maintain 32 PSI cold pressure |
| Faulty oxygen sensor | Reduction of 3-5 MPG | Diagnose and replace sensor |
| Dragging brakes | Reduction of 2-4 MPG | Inspect and service brake system |
Compilation of actual owner experiences with fuel economy.
Positive Reports: "Consistently achieved 24 MPG combined over 150,000 miles." "Highway trips regularly yielded 27 MPG at 60 MPH." "Proper maintenance kept MPG consistent for years."
Common Complaints: "MPG dropped to 18 when carrying heavy loads." "City driving in hilly areas reduced economy to 19 MPG." "Aging components caused 2-3 MPG decrease after 100,000 miles."
The 1988 Ford Ranger in the late 1980s pickup truck market.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What is the highway range? | Approximately 400 miles on a full tank |
| Does premium fuel improve MPG? | No, regular 87 octane is recommended |
| How does AC affect fuel economy? | Reduces MPG by 1-2 in city driving |
| Best speed for highway MPG? | 55-60 MPH provides optimal efficiency |
| MPG difference with 4x4 model? | 4x4 models get 2-3 MPG less than 2WD |
Additional Resources: Ford Technical Service Bulletins, Owner's Manual Supplement, Fuel Economy Testing Data
Support: Contact Ford Customer Service for historical vehicle information